Maven over Ant + Ivy: A team perspective by Les Hazlewood
1 minute read time
Les Hazlewood has an objective summary of why he eventually came around to deciding that Maven is a better overall solution then Ant + Ivy. This is an evolution in thought process that we, Sonatype, often see in enterprises and Les has two blog entries that illustrate this evolution perfectly.
Maven 2 vs Ant+Ivy: Our selection process: This entry gives Les' original perspective on Maven and the process by which he originally decided to choose Ant + Ivy.
Maven 2 vs Ant+Ivy: Revisited: This entry gives Les' new perspective and why his enterprise team, and the Apache Shiro project, have chosen Maven.
I now firmly believe that Maven 2 is a better build and project management tool than Ant+Ivy. I was wrong.
Yep, I said it. I'm man enough to admit when I've made mistakes and that I've learned from my experiences. And this is coming from the guy that wrote a (still popular) OnJava article for Ant in the enterprise.
Overall, life with Maven is good. I'm glad that I was able to swallow my pride, really give it a chance, and in turn reap the benefits. I haven't used Ant in over a year since switching, nor have I ever felt the need to go back.
We hope this perspective helps potential enterprises save time when looking for a build and release infrastructure.
Jason is a co-founder and the former CTO of Sonatype.
Explore All Posts by Jason van Zyl
Try Nexus Repository Free Today
Sonatype Nexus Repository is the world’s most trusted artifact repository manager. Experience the difference and download Community Edition for free.
