Skip Navigation
Resources Blog Open source risk management: Safeguarding software integrity

Open source risk management: Safeguarding software integrity

In the constantly shifting terrain of software supply chains, open source software (OSS) fulfills a dual mandate, propelling innovation forward and serving as the cornerstone of operational efficiency.

Yet, a paradox persists. The reliance upon OSS that fuels progress also highlights a profound industry challenge: the absence of consistent practices for evaluating the inherent risks of OSS adoption, potentially compromising software integrity.

Over the last decade, reliance on OSS has grown exponentially. Known vulnerabilities, cataloged as Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), emerged as a primary metric for assessing security. However, CVEs, albeit invaluable in their own right, tend to cast a narrow beam of light primarily upon developer errors, obscuring the broader spectrum of risks inherent in OSS consumption.

Let's define a broader practice for confronting OSS risk to aim for a more holistic approach.

Open source risk management is the identification, assessment, and mitigation of potential security, compliance, and operational risks associated with using OSS.

Let's explore the concept of open source risk management and discover insights into common issues, benefits, tools, and challenges associated with its implementation.

What are common risks associated with using open source?

While OSS offers a world of innovation and flexibility, it's essential to navigate the potential pitfalls that come with it. Understanding these common risks is vital to effectively secure your organization's software integrity. Below, we cover common risks you might encounter when leveraging OSS.

Software vulnerabilities

Software vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the code or design of a program that can be exploited to compromise the system's security represent a formidable challenge within the open source landscape. Vulnerabilities can be either associated with the project itself or with its dependencies.

While many open source projects remain active, fostering development and ensuring security, others fall into disuse, leaving vulnerabilities unattended and applications exposed to potential threats.

In a chapter on open source security practices for our recently published State of the Software Supply Chain, our research revealed that, based on OpenSSF Scorecard data, maintained projects have lower rates of vulnerabilities but there's a nearly 20% chance that an open source project maintained in 2022, no longer qualifies as maintained in 2023.

Project abandonment leaves vulnerabilities unaddressed for extended periods, creating gaps in your software's defenses. Identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process is a cost-effective strategy, compared to dealing with potential breaches down the road.

Outdated libraries

Related to the importance of project maintenance, many open source libraries inevitably become outdated over time. Outdated libraries can lead to compatibility issues and security vulnerabilities, exposing your applications to unforeseen risks.

Keeping these libraries up-to-date is not just crucial — it's your frontline defense against potential threats. But with the complexity of a software ecosystem, managing updates at scale can be a daunting task, often requiring well-thought-out strategies and rigorous practices.

Licensing risks

OSS comes with a range of licensing options, each with its unique requirements and restrictions. The fine print matters, more often than we realize. Failure to comprehend and comply with these licenses can lead to legal entanglements and could even tarnish your organization's reputation.

Unraveling the legalese behind open source licenses can be a complex and time-consuming task, but it's one that should not be neglected. In a world where non-compliance can have far-reaching consequences, diligent license management is the order of the day.

What are the benefits of open source risk management?

Despite the potential risks, engaging in the active management of open source software risks unfolds a trove of substantial benefits. Below we cover the advantages afforded by open source risk management.

Enhanced security

Regularly assessing and updating open source components within your applications paves the way for a more secure software environment. This proactive approach to risk management allows you to identify and rectify vulnerabilities early in the development process.

The result? A more agile defense against potential security threats. This not only safeguards your applications but also proves to be significantly less costly and disruptive than addressing vulnerabilities in the later stages of development or post-deployment.

Legal compliance and peace of mind

Proper open source risk management is your compass for navigating the intricate landscape of open source licenses. It ensures your organization stays compliant, effectively reducing the risk of legal complications and potential lawsuits.

By understanding and adhering to open source licenses, you not only steer clear of legal entanglements but also uphold your organization's reputation and integrity in the software community.

Improved software quality

Actively managing open source components isn't just about risk mitigation; it's a pathway to enhancing software quality. This commitment to quality results in the creation of more robust and reliable applications. By staying vigilant in your approach to open source risk management, you elevate your software's performance, fortify its stability, and bolster its resilience.

The end product? Applications that not only meet but exceed industry standards, earning you trust and recognition.

What are examples of tools and strategies for open source risk management?

To effectively manage open source risks, you need the right tools and strategies in place. Below we cover a few options to assist with your unique goals in open source risk management.

Comprehensive visibility with Sonatype Lifecycle

A tool such as Sonatype Lifecycle emerges as an indispensable ally in your mission to identify and mitigate open source risks. As a policy engine focused on comprehensive risk management, it offers a panoramic view of the OSS components utilized within your applications.

By illuminating known vulnerabilities, Sonatype Lifecycle empowers you to make informed decisions about which components to include in your projects and control open source risk across your software development life cycle (SDLC). The result is a more secure and resilient software environment that aligns seamlessly with your risk management objectives.

Prioritizing and addressing specific vulnerabilities

Robust risk mitigation is not limited to just identifying vulnerabilities — it's also about smart prioritization and effective resolution. Recognizing that not all vulnerabilities pose an equal threat to your applications, you should strategize to address them based on their potential impact.

This approach ensures that you channel your efforts and resources where they are most needed, safeguarding your applications efficiently and effectively.

Automated scanning with open source software

Leverage software designed to automatically scan your dependencies for known vulnerabilities in OSS components. These sophisticated tools operate as your proactive sentinels, continuously monitoring and assessing the security of your software.

Detecting vulnerabilities in real-time and providing swift alerts enables you to stay ahead in managing open source risks.

What is the role of the open source community in terms of risk management?

The open source community, from the maintainers that sustain OSS projects to the enterprise developers that actively use and contribute to them, can form the foundation of effective risk management.

Let's delve into positive attributes of the open source community that can make it a collaborative force.

Swift detection and patching

At its best, the open source community exemplifies swift and coordinated responses to vulnerabilities. Many maintainers and contributors stay on the lookout for security issues, allowing for rapid detection and patching.

This collaborative spirit reduces the window of opportunity for potential attackers, reinforcing your software's defenses with a strong, collective effort.

Active maintenance and updates

Open source maintainers and contributors ensure open source projects are not just well-maintained but also kept current, addressing compatibility and security concerns.

This dedication to project maintenance showcases the community's commitment to fortifying the software ecosystem, further enhancing the robustness of your applications.

Knowledge sharing and expertise

The open source community itself stands as a massive repository of knowledge and expertise. It encourages unfettered knowledge sharing, offering invaluable resources and insights to help organizations navigate the intricate realm of open source software.

Whether you seek guidance on best practices, have questions regarding licensing, or need assistance in addressing vulnerabilities, the community, at its best, offers open support.

A continual process of defending against threats

Open source software has revolutionized the way we develop and deploy applications, but it's essential to recognize and manage the associated risks.

Open source risk management involves proactive measures to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities, ensure license compliance, and ultimately deliver more secure and high-quality software.

By leveraging tools, community resources, and best practices, application security managers can navigate the complexities of open source risk management effectively. In an ever-evolving and ever-expanding threat landscape, staying ahead of open source risks is crucial for safeguarding your organization's applications and infrastructure.

Picture of Aaron Linskens

Written by Aaron Linskens

Aaron is a technical writer on Sonatype's Marketing team. He works at a crossroads of technical writing, developer advocacy, software development, and open source. He aims to get developers and non-technical collaborators to work well together via experimentation, feedback, and iteration so they can build the right software.